Sunday, October 11, 2009

Alcoa Kicks if Off

Dear Readers,

The market rallied again today - sort of. It closed up after a gap open higher; however, nearly the entire day was quite slow and choppy. The reason for the rally was…the market was open. OK seriously, it was because Alcoa’s earnings were better than expected. The following is from Karl Denninger who digs into the AA report.

An interesting, mostly-positive earnings report - with a few unexplained quirks…..

Let’s dig in a bit and see what we got (the aftermarket loved it!)

Strong points include the fact that the bottom line was a beat; top-line questionable - everyone is claiming “beat” but I had the same number on my screen as they reported, so take your pick - if it’s a beat, it’s not a big one (and might not be one at all.)

Cost-cutting and improved prices for aluminum products are the story here. Here’s the top-line reality: Revenues were $4.6 billion .vs. $4.2, up 9.52% sequentially. Good, right?

Weeeeeellll… aluminum prices went from $1,667 per ton to $1,972, an 18.3% increase.

Now we got a wee problem. This rather strongly implies that the actual shipped volume was down sequentially. Does it prove this? No, as we don’t have product mix shifts in the report, but this sure as hell suggests a decrease in shipped tonnage sequentially, not just year/over/year, and is a big fat flashing yellow light that I bet you don’t see talked about.

What makes no sense here is this statement in the release:

Due to low inventories at distributors and rising shipments, regional premiums are improving and global aluminum consumption is expected to increase 11 percent in the second half of 2009.

I don’t believe it, to be blunt. You don’t have a 9% increase in gross sales on an 18% increase in prices and tell me that shipments are rising, unless you’re somehow magically making product appear at customers for which you’re not being paid. The internals of the report and the breakdown don’t help me come up with a reconciliation either.

Something doesn’t add up.

Oh wait! Here it is! Right at the bottom of the report (missed it first pass; thanks to the guy who emailed me!): 1,230,000 metric tons shipped this quarter, 1,288,000 metric tons last quarter.

BINGO!

SHIPMENTS WERE IN FACT DOWN SEQUENTIALLY!

The conference call says they’re looking for a 4% rise in demand in China and 6% worldwide, but a 15-20% decline in automotive sales for the full year 2009 and 30-35% decrease in heavy trucks (indeed, there was a report out this afternoon on Class 8 truck sales - horrifyingly bad doesn’t even begin to describe it.) But wait! The release also says:global aluminum consumption is expected to increase 11 percent in the second half of 2009.

Uh…. those numbers don’t add up either. What am I missing here guys and dolls?

The rest of the report seems to make sense - the only other area of trouble I see is in engineered products, which is Alcoa’s highest-margin business and is in serious trouble, down 15% sequentially. That’s mostly aerospace - read “airplanes.” Not exactly a growth industry at present……

I’m disturbed, however, by the apparent discrepancy in claimed numbers in two different places and the consolidated result statement saying that in fact shipments didn’t increase, they fell.

That is hardly the picture of “improving demand” claimed to be experienced in the reported quarter and forecast - especially when that forecast is for an increase that would simply reverse the 3rd quarter tonnage decline implied by pricing and revenues (that is, take us back to second quarter tonnage-shipped levels.)

Finally, there’s the matter of P/E. Assuming we could get to a normalized 12 month leading expectation of 70 cents in fully-diluted earnings by the middle of 2010 (and I believe that’s damn aggressive) you’re paying 21x on those earnings 12 months out - too darn rich for me for an industrial concern on any reasonable set of forward expectations.

I liked AA in the $5s in March, but I wouldn’t go anywhere near it at $15 today.

Sorry, no $ale.

Disclosure: No position; I sold out of my spring long at what was obviously early, but if I still had it, I’d be selling into this strength.

Trade well and follow the trend, not the so-called “experts.”

Go to www.PitNoise.com for a trial run.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Notes from the Pit…for 10-09-09

ATTEMPTED DIRECTION: BUYER or SELLER

1) Rotation Buyer

2) Range Extension Buyer

3) Public went home as a… Neither

4) Buying-Selling Tails Buyer

5) Open in Bull or Bear Range Neither

ATTEMPTED DIRECTION: Higher =Yes Lower = Neutral=

Comments: The attempted direction was bullish but with a neutral structure.

ATTEMPTED PERFORMANCE:

1) Today’s NYSE Volume compared to prior day & 10-day average.

Today (1.274 billion) Higher =XX Lower = Unchanged =

10-day Ave: (1.278 billion) Higher = Lower = Unchanged =XX

2) Value Area: Higher =XX OL/Higher= OL/Lower =

Lower = Inside= Outside =

3) VA Width: Wider = Narrower = Unchanged=XX

COMMENTS: The VA was higher but unchanged again with lame volume for another advancing day. Advancers vs. decliners were 3-1. Attempted performance was bullish but slowing.

POTENTIAL RESULTS: No reports will be released Friday. Thursday’s auction & volume were terrible again at higher levels. Due to another balancing day we should expect a breakout auction in either direction.

Support = 1055.00, 1042.30, 1038.50

Resistance = 1076.00, 1083.00, 1100.0

Institutional support = none

Institutional resistance = none

Please use the pivot calculator in the “shared folder” for all of today’s pivots

__________________________________________________________________________________

Results from Virtual Trading Room

Electronic (ES) mini-SP 500

1) FT buy @ 12:11pm at 1063.25 = +.25 (1 lot)

2) Engf buy @ 2:17pm at 1063.50 = +1.00 & +1.00 (2 lot)

3) Algorithm positions (7)

4) ”Reading the Tape” positions (1) …combined Secret’s, Algo, & “Reading the Tape” total…-1.25

___________________________________________________________________________________

Today’s Value Areas:

Use These Value Areas

for Trading on FRI

ES 1065.25 / 1059.75

YM 9763 / 9721

NQ 1726.50 / 1715.50

___________________________________________________________________________________

Today’s Trading Tip:

The more I talk to new traders, the more I realize exactly what they need to do to become successful: practice, practice, and practice some more!

___________________________________________________________________________________

To read the Value Area Help Guide, please copy and paste this into your address bar:

http://www.secretsoftraders.com/ValueAreaHelpGuide.htm

To read about how I became a trader, please copy and paste this into your address bar:

http://www.secretsoftraders.com/who-is-larry-levin.shtml

To view my recent trading statements, please copy and paste this into your address bar:

http://www.secretsoftraders.com/secretRoomLogin.asp

To read about my intensive Training Programs, please copy and paste this into your address bar:

http://www.secretsoftraders.com/mentorship-programs.shtml

Secrets of Traders

The Chicago Board of Trading Building

141 W Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604

888-755-3846

312-235-2572

info@secretsoftraders.com

In an effort to comply with all applicable rules and regulations please be so kind and read the disclaimer below:

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Futures and Options trading has large potential rewards, but also large potential risk. You must be aware of the risks and be willing to accept them in order to invest in the futures and options markets. Don’t trade with money you can’t afford to lose. Nothing in our website shall be deemed a solicitation or an offer to Buy/Sell futures and/or options. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those discussed on our site. Also, the past performance of any trading methodology is not necessarily indicative of future results.

DAYTRADING involves high risks and YOU can LOSE a lot of money. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those talked about in our site.


Source: Secrets Of Trader